Search for: All records

We consider hypergraph network design problems where the goal is to construct a hypergraph that satisfies certain connectivity requirements. For graph network design problems where the goal is to construct a graph that satisfies certain connectivity requirements, the number of edges in every feasible solution is at most quadratic in the number of vertices. In contrast, for hypergraph network design problems, we might have feasible solutions in which the number of hyperedges is exponential in the number of vertices. This presents an additional technical challenge in hypergraph network design problems compared to graph network design problems: in order to solve the problem in polynomial time, we first need to show that there exists a feasible solution in which the number of hyperedges is polynomial in the input size. The central theme of this work is to overcome this additional technical challenge for certain hypergraph network design problems. We show that these hypergraph network design problems admit solutions in which the number of hyperedges is polynomial in the number of vertices and moreover, can be solved in strongly polynomial time. Our work improves on the previous fastest pseudo-polynomial run-time for these problems. As applications of our results, we derive the first strongly polynomial time algorithms for (i) degree-specified hypergraph connectivity augmentation using hyperedges and (ii) degree-specified hypergraph node-to-area connectivity augmentation using hyperedges. 

The splitting-off operation in undirected graphs is a fundamental reduction operation that detaches all edges incident to a given vertex and adds new edges between the neighbors of that vertex while preserving their degrees. Lovász [Lov{á}sz, 1974; Lov{á}sz, 1993] and Mader [Mader, 1978] showed the existence of this operation while preserving global and local connectivities respectively in graphs under certain conditions. These results have far-reaching applications in graph algorithms literature [Lovász, 1976; Mader, 1978; Frank, 1993; Frank and Király, 2002; Király and Lau, 2008; Frank, 1992; Goemans and Bertsimas, 1993; Frank, 1994; Bang-Jensen et al., 1995; Frank, 2011; Nagamochi and Ibaraki, 2008; Nagamochi et al., 1997; Henzinger and Williamson, 1996; Goemans, 2001; Jordán, 2003; Kriesell, 2003; Jain et al., 2003; Chan et al., 2011; Bhalgat et al., 2008; Lau, 2007; Chekuri and Shepherd, 2008; Nägele and Zenklusen, 2020; Blauth and Nägele, 2023]. In this work, we introduce a splitting-off operation in hypergraphs. We show that there exists a local connectivity preserving complete splitting-off in hypergraphs and give a strongly polynomial-time algorithm to compute it in weighted hypergraphs. We illustrate the usefulness of our splitting-off operation in hypergraphs by showing two applications: (1) we give a constructive characterization of k-hyperedge-connected hypergraphs and (2) we give an alternate proof of an approximate min-max relation for max Steiner rooted-connected orientation of graphs and hypergraphs (due to Király and Lau [Király and Lau, 2008]). Our proof of the approximate min-max relation for graphs circumvents the Nash-Williams' strong orientation theorem and uses tools developed for hypergraphs. 

We consider the problem of enumerating optimal solutions for two hypergraph k-partitioning problems, namely, Hypergraph-k-Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph-k-Partition. The input in hypergraph k-partitioning problems is a hypergraph [Formula: see text] with positive hyperedge costs along with a fixed positive integer k. The goal is to find a partition of V into k nonempty parts [Formula: see text]—known as a k-partition—so as to minimize an objective of interest. (1) If the objective of interest is the maximum cut value of the parts, then the problem is known as Minmax-Hypergraph-k-Partition. A subset of hyperedges is a minmax-k-cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum k-partition for Minmax-Hypergraph-k-Partition. (2) If the objective of interest is the total cost of hyperedges crossing the k-partition, then the problem is known as Hypergraph-k-Cut. A subset of hyperedges is a min-k-cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum k-partition for Hypergraph-k-Cut. We give the first polynomial bound on the number of minmax-k-cut-sets and a polynomial-time algorithm to enumerate all of them in hypergraphs for every fixed k. Our technique is strong enough to also enable an [Formula: see text]-time deterministic algorithm to enumerate all min-k-cut-sets in hypergraphs, thus improving on the previously known [Formula: see text]-time deterministic algorithm, in which n is the number of vertices and p is the size of the hypergraph. The correctness analysis of our enumeration approach relies on a structural result that is a strong and unifying generalization of known structural results for Hypergraph-k-Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph-k-Partition. We believe that our structural result is likely to be of independent interest in the theory of hypergraphs (and graphs). Funding: All authors were supported by NSF AF 1814613 and 1907937. 

Dense subgraph discovery is an important problem in graph mining and network analysis with several applications. Two canonical polynomial-time solvable problems here are to find a maxcore (subgraph of maximum min degree) and to find a densest subgraph (subgraph of maximum average degree). Both of these problems can be solved in polynomial time. Veldt, Benson, and Kleinberg [Veldt et al., 2021] introduced the generalized p-mean densest subgraph problem which captures the maxcore problem when p = -∞ and the densest subgraph problem when p = 1. They observed that for p ≥ 1, the objective function is supermodular and hence the problem can be solved in polynomial time. In this work, we focus on the p-mean densest subgraph problem for p ∈ (-∞, 1). We prove that for every p ∈ (-∞,1), the problem is NP-hard, thus resolving an open question from [Veldt et al., 2021]. We also show that for every p ∈ (0,1), the weighted version of the problem is APX-hard. On the algorithmic front, we describe two simple 1/2-approximation algorithms for every p ∈ (-∞, 1). We complement the approximation algorithms by exhibiting non-trivial instances on which the algorithms simultaneously achieve an approximation factor of at most 1/2.